I’ll be at Cafe OTO on Tuesday 24th June for the third in a series of events hosted by The Wire magazine looking at the impact of AI on contemporary music making.
I’ll be presenting on the implications of AI for blogospheric topics from the 2000s-2010s, regarding hauntology, salvagepunk and accelerationism as three different approaches to the cultural production of the new and how the recombinatory processes of AI sampling are changing our relationship to appropriation and sampling in music.
Afterwards, there’ll be a panel discussion hosted by Robert Barry, featuring myself and the other participants, who are Loré Lixenberg, Elaine Mitchener and Vicki Bennett (People Like Us).
More information here and a brief pitch for the event below:
Generative music systems were around long before generative AI. This event looks at a previous history of music as a series of inputs, workflows, and rules-based processes, from Fluxus onward. What are the choices that inform generative music systems internally (in scores, programming, and technical possibilities) and externally (in power structures between performers, users, and corporations)?
Generative AI also generates its outputs from massive datasets, and can be ‘trained’ on the work of thousands of anonymised creative artists. Debates are heated about copyright, ownership and originality, and the consent of artists and creators to be used in these massive datasets. What does Generative AI say to the rules we have about what constitutes agency and identity, and the distinction between self and other in relation to information transmission and exchange? Looking into plunderphonics, folk, sampling and copy cultures, were or are other paths possible?