The Deep

“There’s life here, but not as we know it”

I fell asleep to From Beyond the other night, following a recommendation from n1x, and it’ll come as no surprise that I do not recommend doing that. I had very strange stress-dreams.

Last night I inadvertently repeated my folly but by watching something far more wholesome.


David Attenborough is back on British screens with Blue Planet II at the moment. The series is currently only two episodes in and with all the usual glorious footage and sound design of the natural world that people have come to expect from the last decade or so of big-budget BBC productions.

The second episode of the series was extra special though. Surely a highlight of every series, the episodes exploring the deepest waters on our planet never disappoint with footage of strange things from below.

This episode takes us on an epic journey into the unknown, a realm that feels almost like science fiction. We discover alien worlds, bizarre creatures and extraordinary new behaviours never seen before.

The Deep” is explicit in its SF references as the BBC team explores the deepest oceans around Antarctica, “more difficult to explore than outer space”. It is one hour of horrifying and beautiful nautogothic textures. With the sound off, much of its feels like an extended opening sequence to Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Also, if it weren’t for David Attenborough’s calm grandfatherly voice, his narrations and descriptions of some of the creatures down there could be mistaken for Lovecraftian prose.

Untitled-5.jpg

Alongside all the usual deep-water cephalopods, there were creatures like the barreleye – “a fish with a transparent head filled with jelly so it can look up through its skull” – and, my personal favourite, the Siphonophores (see header image):

Down here, in this blackness, creatures live beyond the normal rules of time. Siphonorores are virtually eternal. They repeatedly clone themselves – some eventually growing longer than a blue whale.

Later, a sequence showing eels diving into an underwater lake of concentrated salt water that sits, paradoxically, at the bottom of the ocean is more than a little sinister. Disembodied tentacles from beyond diving in and out of a poison void within a void. “Spending too long in it can send an eel into toxic shock”, Attenborough narrates, as an eel convulses, tying itself in uncontrollable knots. “Others are not so lucky.” We see a squid floating on the surface of the underwater lake. “The brine embalms their bodies and the casualties of decades accumulate around the margins.”

Untitled-15.jpg

Untitled-16.jpg

Having just watched From Beyond on n1x’s recommendation, I couldn’t get their recent post, “the aphotic insurrection“, out of my head.

…it has been said that the Wired is ?, or sui. Ocean and water. The extraterrestrial, which resists stability. It is a largely three-dimensional space, chaotic and impossible to territorialize (nothing that dwells in ? is ever fully at rest). Very few of ? is hospitable to any forms of agency. Most of ? is blanketed in an endless cavelike night. And yet at the greatest, most hostile depths — where cave and mantle meet — is where ? is richest in nutrients. Here, only automaton-like worms survive.

Continue reading “The Deep”

Deleuze and Outsideness

A few months ago I ended up reading what — I think — is Gilles Deleuze’s first published essay, and I was pleasantly surprised how much it resonated with current questions I have regarding communism and outsideness.

The essay, titled “From Christ to the Bourgeoisie”, was published in 1946 in the short-lived philosophy journal Espace. Deleuze declares in the opening paragraph that “today many people no longer [believe] in interior life, it no longer pays to do so” and it is our “industrial and technical world” that has reduced mankind to “total exteriority.”

However, Deleuze argues, this is nonetheless a preferable position to be in despite the general cynicism towards a loss of moralising religiosity in some corners of social life at the time. He argues that the limiting of spirituality to interior life, as is Christianity and capitalism’s entangled raison d’etre, is to limit consciousness itself. He continues, highlighting the essentiality of externalisation to consciousness-raising:

Is there no spiritual life apart from interior life? In this purely objective world where the workman works with companions, the Leader [Chef], the Instigator [Meneur] can emerge. The Leader, is the one that reveals a possible world, in which for example the workman would no longer work for masters. But this world, thus revealed, remains external, no less external than the first world in which he was born. So much so that the first objective world envelops in itself the principle of its own negation, without reference to any interiority. The Leader is the one that offers a friendship, not love, a friendship within a team [équipe]. Out of friendship, the team consists in realizing the possible outside world that the chief revealed.

It all sounds sort of familiar.

The Outside is the ‘place’ of strategic advantage. To be cast out there is no cause for lamentation, in the slightest.

 

Industrial 3: Post-Industrial Self

? Part 2

Loneliness clarifies. Here silence stands
Like heat. Here leaves unnoticed thicken,
Hidden weeds flower, neglected waters quicken,
Luminously-peopled air ascends;
And past the poppies bluish neutral distance
Ends the land suddenly beyond a beach
Of shapes and shingle. Here is unfenced existence:
Facing the sun, untalkative, out of reach.

This final stanza from Philip Larkin’s poem Here is one of the most famous descriptions of the psychogeographic affect of living in Hull. Situated at the eastern end of the M62, the city has previously drawn little attention from the rest of the country (except to mock its post-industrial stutterings—and later retractions). Liverpool, at the western end of the motorway, has its own unique version of this phenomenon but Hull has continued to exist in apparent isolation for most of the post-war period. COUM and Throbbing Gristle were one of the few instances of engagement with the negative community of those who too face the sun, untalkative, out of reach.

Continue reading “Industrial 3: Post-Industrial Self”

AI Backlash

A new series has started on The Guardian today on “The AI Future“, and I find myself equally amused and bemused by the tone of the first article, not least because its set-up feels self-devouring as it highlights issues about diversity and the marginalisation of concerns and potentials and then goes on to double-down on that very singular concern: namely, what does AI mean for capitalism?

That’s not an uninteresting question but I’d have more time for it if it was framed that way up front rather than settling for the euphemistic “society”:

In October, Dame Wendy Hall, professor of computer science at Southampton University, co-chaired an independent review on the British AI industry. The report found that AI had the potential to add £630bn to the economy by 2035. But to reap the rewards, the technology must benefit society, she said.

“AI will affect every aspect of our infrastructure and we have to make sure that it benefits us,” she said. “We have to think about all the issues. When machines can learn and do things for themselves, what are the dangers for us as a society? It’s important because the nations that grasp the issues will be the winners in the next industrial revolution.”

Whilst “society” intends to speak to us all, industry nonetheless remains the bottom line.

I’m interested to see where this series goes and if its tone and perspective remains the same. It’s also got me revisiting Nick Land’s NCRaP Anthropol lecture series.

Aren’t we, in talking about AI existential risk, just talking about capitalism?

There are so many slight references here that are both interesting and amusing. Of course, ‘Sophia’ the robot makes an appearance – always with quotation marks, doing what they can to undermine her apparent subjectivity – in which she quotes William Gibson to those who will perhaps later control the Turing Cops that The Guardian is hoping to see.

Time is already tying itself in knots here.

A finale side note: to compare AI to GM crops is interesting – even if just with regards to its social perception and anticipated backlash. Another point I hope – but cynically doubt – this series will expand on further.

UPDATE: 

It seems rare that you can find The Guardian and InfoWars discussing the same topic on the same terms.